Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Pelaporan dan Penindakan Pelanggaran Peraturan Daerah di Kota Batam

Authors

  • Saddam Saddam Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam 29425, Indonesia
  • Isfandir Hutasoit Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam 29425, Indonesia
  • Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam 29425, Indonesia
  • Edwar Kelvin Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam 29425, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8227

Keywords:

Pelaporan Digital, Penindakan Peraturan Daerah, Satpol PP, Tata Kelola Data, Keamanan Aplikasi, AUPB, Due Process Digital

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis pemanfaatan teknologi digital dalam pelaporan dan penindakan pelanggaran peraturan daerah di Kota Batam serta konsekuensi hukumnya bagi akuntabilitas penegakan dan perlindungan hak warga. Desain penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan strategi normatif-terapan melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus, didukung telaah literatur serta analisis dokumen kebijakan dan praktik kelembagaan. Analisis dilakukan dengan membangun rantai proses pelaporan–penindakan  dan mengevaluasinya menggunakan matriks lima dimensi: legalitas dan AUPB, tata kelola data pribadi, keamanan aplikasi, pembuktian serta jejak administratif dan mekanisme pengawasan serta keberatan. Hasil menunjukkan pelaporan digital berpotensi meningkatkan responsivitas dan transparansi proses, namun efektivitas hukumnya sangat ditentukan oleh standar verifikasi minimum, minimisasi data, kontrol akses dan retensi, audit keamanan berkala, serta dokumentasi tindakan yang konsisten. Titik rawan teridentifikasi pada fase verifikasi, penyimpanan bukti data, serta eskalasi tindakan. Penelitian merekomendasikan kerangka due process digital untuk penegakan peraturan daerah melalui SOP verifikasi dan eskalasi, privacy-by-design dan security-by-design, audit trail yang dapat diaudit, indikator kinerja yang memasukkan fairness dan inklusivitas serta kanal koreksi yang mudah diakses. Kontribusi penelitian terletak pada parameter operasional yang dapat digunakan pemerintah daerah untuk memperkuat legitimasi penindakan berbasis laporan digital di kota maju dalam konteks negara berkembang.

References

Agozie, D. Q., & Kaya, T. (2021). Discerning the effect of privacy information transparency on privacy fatigue in e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101601

Al-Kautsar Maktub, M., Handayani, P. W., & Sunarso, F. P. (2025). Citizen acceptance and use of the Jakarta Kini (JAKI) e-government: Extended unified model for electronic government adoption. Heliyon, 11(2), e42078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42078

Balapour, A., Nikkhah, H. R., & Sabherwal, R. (2020). Mobile application security: Role of perceived privacy as the predictor of security perceptions. International Journal of Information Management, 52(2), 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102063

Benmohamed, N., Shen, J., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2024). Public value creation through the use of open government data in Australian public sector: A quantitative study from employees’ perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101930

Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-Level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517

Cook, S. J., Zuhlke, S., & Saywitz, R. (2024). Potholes, 311 reports, and a theory of heterogeneous resident demand for city services. Policy Studies Journal, 52(3), 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12540

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270550

de Boer, N. (2021). The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style: Do citizens shame or obey bureaucrats? Public Policy and Administration, 36(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720905005

de Boer, N., Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. (2018). Does Disclosure of Performance Information Influence Street‐level Bureaucrats’ Enforcement Style? Public Administration Review, 78(5), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12926

de Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2023). Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684

Francey, A., & Mettler, T. (2021). The effects of open government data: Some stylised facts. Information Polity, 26(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200281

Gershgoren, S., & Cohen, N. (2023a). Street-Level Bias: Examining Factors Related to Street-Level Bureaucrats’ State or Citizen Favoritism. The American Review of Public Administration, 53(3–4), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231167897

Gershgoren, S., & Cohen, N. (2023b). Does appealability foster more citizen‐friendly decisions at the street level? Regulation & Governance, 17(4), 1058–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12503

Graham, F. S., Gooden, S. T., & Martin, K. J. (2016). Navigating the Transparency–Privacy Paradox in Public Sector Data Sharing. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014561116

Hassan, M. S., Al Halbusi, H., Ahmad, A. B., Abdelfattah, F., Thamir, Z., & Raja Ariffin, R. N. (2023). Discretion and its effects: analyzing the role of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement styles. International Review of Public Administration, 28(4), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2286671

Jiao, Y., Li, C., Yao, Z., Weng, C., Lian, A., & Dong, R. (2024). How can online citizen complaints provide solutions to refine environmental management: A spatio-temporal perspective. Information Processing & Management, 61(2), 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103611

Larsen, F., Møller, M. Ø., & Raaphorst, N. (2025). Public management and street-level bureaucrats. Public Management Review, 27(8), 1857–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2493875

Mao, Z., Zhang, W., Zou, Q., & Deng, W. (2025). The effects of e-participation on voice and accountability: are there differences between countries? Information Technology for Development, 31(2), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2373745

Marienfeldt, J. (2024). Does digital government hollow out the essence of street‐level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools’ foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street‐level decision‐making. Social Policy & Administration, 58(5), 831–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12991

Matheus, R., Faber, R., Ismagilova, E., & Janssen, M. (2023). Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government. International Journal of Information Management, 73, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102690

Putrijanti, A., Leonard, L. T., & Utama, K. W. (2018). Peran PTUN dan AUPB Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.33056

Radhi, H. D. A. (2021). The legal capability thought and its application at the Civil law. Review of International Geographical Education, 11(4), 1254–1269. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.04.121

Sentana, I. W. B., Ciptayani, P. I., & Dewi, K. C. (2024). Measuring the Security of Indonesian Local Goverment Mobile Apps. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.136

Susanto, T. D., Diani, M. M., & Hafidz, I. (2017). User Acceptance of e-government Citizen Report System (a Case Study of City113 App). Procedia Computer Science, 124, 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.190

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2381–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8

Wu, W.-N. (2024). Influence of citizen relationship management system on citizen participation in Taiwan: A participatory politics perspective. Cities, 154, 105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105396

Zhao, B., Cheng, S., Schiff, K. J., & Kim, Y. (2023). Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Saddam, S., Hutasoit, I., Bhakti, R. T. A., & Kelvin, E. (2026). Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Pelaporan dan Penindakan Pelanggaran Peraturan Daerah di Kota Batam. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(4), 2785–2794. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8227

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Saddam Saddam, Isfandir Hutasoit, Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti, Edwar Kelvin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di JIHHP.