Mengukur Efektivitas Penindakan Kenakalan Remaja Sekolah Oleh Pemerintah Kota Batam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i3.7937Keywords:
Penindakan, Efektifitas, Keadilan Prosedural, Legitimasi, Kenakalan Remaja, BatamAbstract
Kenakalan remaja sekolah di Kota Batam meliputi membolos, berkeliaran pada jam pelajaran dan pelanggaran tata tertib menjadi persoalan yang berdampak pada ketertiban belajar dan ketenteraman ruang publik. Pemerintah Kota Batam merespons melalui penindakan, pengawasan pelajar pada jam sekolah, namun efektivitas kebijakan perlu dinilai tidak hanya dari intensitas operasi, melainkan mekanisme yang menjelaskan perubahan perilaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh efektivitas penindakan pemerintah (X) terhadap luaran perilaku siswa (Z) dengan menempatkan legitimasi/keadilan prosedural (Y) sebagai mediator. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksplanatori dengan survei pada 100 siswa SMA/SMK di Batam dan dianalisis menggunakan SEM-PLS (SmartPLS). Indikator memenuhi kelayakan model pengukuran outer loading ≥0.70, reliabilitas konstruk α 0.722-0.765; CR 0.703-0.784 dan validitas konvergen AVE 0.625-0.642. Hasil model struktural menunjukkan pengaruh langsung yang kuat dan signifikan X-Y (β=0.828; t=45.543; p<0.001) serta Y-Z (β=0.735; t=10.730; p<0.001) dan efek tidak langsung X-Y-Z signifikan (β=0.609; t=10.593; p<0.001) menegaskan peran mediasi legitimasi/keadilan prosedural. Temuan mengindikasikan bahwa penindakan yang konsisten, sesuai SOP, disertai penjelasan dan tindak lanjut yang jelas lebih efektif ketika membangun persepsi keadilan, sehingga mendukung kepatuhan siswa terhadap ketertiban sekolah atau penurunan kecenderungan kenakalan. Secara praktis, kebijakan Batam perlu menekankan kualitas prosedur, komunikasi yang menghormati dan mekanisme tindak lanjut berbasis pembinaan.
References
Angkasawati, R. (2022). Peranan satuan polisi pamong praja dalam pembinaan kenakalan remaja/pelajar di Kabupaten Tulungagung. Publiciana, 5(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36563/publiciana.v13i2.173
Bezemer, W. E., Born, M. P., & Leerkes, A. S. (2024). Addressing Ethnic Differences in the Validity of Self-reported Criminal Behaviour Through a Social Desirability Measure. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 40(2), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-023-09567-y
Chan, A., Bradford, B., & Stott, C. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural justice and legitimacy in policing: the effect of social identity and social contexts. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 21(2), 349–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09595-5
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1st Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Lösel, F., & Ttofi, M. M. (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.003
Fathani, A. T., Putera, R. E., & Mohamed, N. (2024). The Perils of Bureaucratic Inertia: A Steps Toward Enchancing Government Management. JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA, 8(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v8i1.5976
Fry, L. W., & Cohen, M. P. (2009). Spiritual Leadership as a Paradigm for Organizational Transformation and Recovery from Extended Work Hours Cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(S2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9695-2
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hasan, R., Watson, B., Haworth, N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., & Bates, L. (2024). How do perceptions of procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legitimacy of laws influence intentions to drug drive? Journal of Safety Research, 90, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.006
Hidayah, N. R. (2020). Kontrol Diri dan Konformitas Terhadap Kenakalan Remaja. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 8(4), 657. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v8i4.5571
Indrawati, Y. V. (2023). Model Komunikasi Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Pada Program Operasi Kasih Sayang Penertiban Pelajar di Serdang Bedagai. JURNAL SIMBOLIKA Research and Learning in Communication Study, 8(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.31289/simbolika.v8i2.6230
Kapoor, S. (2025). The Role of SmartPLS in Optimizing Statistical Analysis: A Case Study Approach. 2025 5th International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRASET64571.2025.11008204
Kwak, D.-H. (Austin), Ma, X., & Kim, S. (2021). When does social desirability become a problem? Detection and reduction of social desirability bias in information systems research. Information & Management, 58(7), 103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103500
Latan, H., & Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial least squares: Concepts, techniques and application using program SmartPLS 3.0. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
Li, J. C. M., Zhang, S. Y., Sun, I. Y., & Ho, A. S. K. (2024). Police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth: a scoping review of definitions, determinants, and consequences. Frontiers in Sociology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1409080
Liu, L., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2024). A Practical Guide to Counterfactual Estimators for Causal Inference with Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Data. American Journal of Political Science, 68(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12723
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.1
McGloin, J. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2019). Peer Influence and Delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024551
Mohammad, T., & Nooraini, I. (2021). Routine activity theory and juvenile delinquency: The roles of peers and family monitoring among Malaysian adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105795
Muklir, M., & Mustika, S. D. (2020). Performance of Pamong Praja Police Units in Disciplining Students in Timang Gajah District Bener Meriah Regency. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM), 1(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v1i2.3143
O, S., & Wilcox, P. (2018). Routine Activity Theory, Target Congruence, and School Context: A Multilevel Analysis of Teacher Victimization. Victims & Offenders, 13(3), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2017.1329174
Podsakoff, P. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7
Putera, R. E., Fathani, A. T., Lenggogeni, S., & Asrinaldi. (2025). Tourism disaster management dilemmas: Insights from Mandalika, Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(January), 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101400
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
Schuberth, F. (2021). Confirmatory composite analysis using partial least squares: setting the record straight. Review of Managerial Science, 15(5), 1311–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00405-0
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Tibrani, T., Zabri, S. M., & Hakim, L. (2024). An Analysis of the Relationship between Prices, Shopping Habits, Promotions, and Fashion Involvements in Impulsive Buying Decisions. Binus Business Review, 15(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v15i3.11001
Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015). The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791
Van Petegem, S., Trinkner, R., van der Kaap‐Deeder, J., Antonietti, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2021). Police procedural justice and adolescents’ internalization of the law: Integrating self‐determination theory into legal socialization research. Journal of Social Issues, 77(2), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12425
Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuška, J., & Kelley, E. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.10.001
Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2016). Retributive Justice. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 237–256). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_13
Wood, G., Tyler, T. R., & Papachristos, A. V. (2020). Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(18), 9815–9821. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920671117
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nenny Dwiyana, Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti, Indra Sakti, Seftia Azrianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di JIHHP.
