The Effect of Internal Control, Compliance, and Management Compensation on Employees’ Ethical Behavior (A Case Study at the Regional Secretariat of Indramayu Regency)

Authors

  • Irvan Setiawan Universitas Widyatama, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Nurul Hermina Universitas Widyatama, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jimt.v8i1.9845

Keywords:

internal control, compliance, management compensation, ethical behavior, local government

Abstract

Employees’ ethical behavior is essential to government administration characterized by integrity, accountability, and public trust. However, the existence of formal regulations and control mechanisms does not necessarily ensure consistent ethical conduct. Previous studies on internal control, compliance, and management compensation have reported inconsistent findings and have predominantly examined non-governmental organizations, leaving limited evidence on how these factors jointly operate in local government bureaucracies. This study aims to examine the effects of internal control, compliance, and management compensation on employees’ ethical behavior at the Regional Secretariat of Indramayu Regency. A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed. Data were collected through questionnaires from 102 employees selected using proportionate stratified random sampling from a population of 137 employees, with proportional representation across organizational units. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results show that internal control (β = 0.200, p = 0.004), compliance (β = 0.185, p = 0.031), and management compensation (β = 0.551, p < 0.001) have positive and statistically significant effects on employees’ ethical behavior. The model is statistically significant (F = 64.158, p < 0.001) and explains 66.3% of the variance in ethical behavior (R² = 0.663). Management compensation is the strongest predictor, suggesting that perceived fairness, transparency, and alignment of rewards with responsibilities may play an important role in reinforcing ethical conduct beyond formal control mechanisms. Theoretically, these findings extend the understanding of ethical behavior by highlighting the complementary role of organizational reward systems alongside formal control and compliance mechanisms in the public-sector context.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Arifiyani, H. A., & Sukirno. (2012). Pengaruh pengendalian intern, kepatuhan dan kompensasi manajemen terhadap perilaku etis karyawan (Studi kasus PT Adi Satria Abadi Yogyakarta). Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 1(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v1i2.995

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework: Executive summary. COSO.

De Grave, A., & Rachmi, H. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku etis berdasarkan persepsi karyawan pada PT Sumber Hutama Tirtakaltim Balikpapan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Visioner, 12(2), 178–202.

Hidayat, D., & Aulia, A. (2015). Pengaruh pengendalian intern, kepatuhan, dan kompensasi manajemen terhadap perilaku etis manajer pada PT. Swastisiddhi Amagra. Jurnal Ekonomi KIAT, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25299/kiat.2015.vol24(1).2883

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kristanti, M., Herdi, H., & Jaeng, W. M. Y. (2024). Pengaruh kepatuhan pengendalian internal terhadap perilaku etis karyawan dalam sistem penggajian (Studi kasus pada karyawan KSP Kopdit Tuke Jung). Akuntansi dan Ekonomi Pajak: Perspektif Global, 1(4), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.61132/aeppg.v1i4.498

Leunupun, P., & Pattinama, G. L. L. (2020). Kompensasi manajemen dan kepatuhan dalam kaitan dengan perilaku etis karyawan. Peluang, 14(2), 176–189.

Maulana, R. A., & Aryati, A. S. (2024). Pengaruh kompensasi dan work-life balance terhadap perilaku etis pegawai. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi, 3(3), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.21776/jki.2024.03.3.20

Merta, I. K., Sudiasa, I. K., & Yusnimi, N. M. (2024). Pengaruh pengendalian intern, kepatuhan dan kompensasi manajemen terhadap perilaku etis karyawan pada LPD Karangasem Bali. Journal on Education, 6(4), 21922–21930. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.6381

Rahmi, S. L., & Arwiyah, M. Y. (2019). Pengaruh kepatuhan terhadap perilaku etis karyawan pada PT Bank Yudha Bhakti Tbk. Jakarta. eProceedings of Management, 6(2).

Sidauruk, T. D., & Lestari, S. (2017). Pengaruh pengendalian intern, kepatuhan, kompensasi manajemen terhadap perilaku etis karyawan (Studi kasus pada perusahaan distributor farmasi PT Enseval Putera Megatrading Tbk Pusat). Jurnal Liabilitas, 2(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v2i1.17

Wibawa, I. M. S. W., & Suryanawa, I. K. (2021). Kepatuhan pengendalian intern dan perilaku etis karyawan di PT. Intan Bali Cargo International. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(12), 3221–3230. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i12.p14

Yulia, S. (2019). Pengaruh pengendalian intern, kepatuhan dan kompensasi manajemen terhadap perilaku etis karyawan (Studi kasus pada PT Agung Toyota Pekanbaru) [Thesis, Universitas Islam Riau].

Downloads

Published

2026-09-19

How to Cite

Irvan Setiawan, & Nurul Hermina. (2026). The Effect of Internal Control, Compliance, and Management Compensation on Employees’ Ethical Behavior (A Case Study at the Regional Secretariat of Indramayu Regency). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 8(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.38035/jimt.v8i1.9845