Konsep Emansipasi Intelektual Menurut Jacques Ranciere dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Dewa Gede Putra Atmajaya Fakultas Filsafat, UNWIRA Kupang, Indonesia
  • Oktovianus Kosat Fakultas Filsafat, UNWIRA Kupang, Indonesia
  • Mario Venerial Umbu Zerri Fakultas Filsafat, UNWIRA Kupang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2083

Keywords:

Intellectual Emancipation, Education, Relevance

Abstract

Education is one of the most important aspects that requires serious attention in a country. Education is the heart and capital that can brighten the future of a nation. So every country continues to update and evaluate its education system based on existing realities. There is always an overhaul or update to adjust the system so that education can run effectively. Indonesia is also making changes to its education system. However, do these changes ensure justice and equality for learners? Are learners really the subject of the existing education system? So the purpose of this research is to examine the existence of practices in the world of education that produce inequality. The main theory used is Jacques Ranciere's concept of intellectual emancipation. The method used is literature. It was found that inequality often occurs in the world of education through the system implemented. The results of this study can provide a new understanding of the importance of a country prioritizing equality in an education system.

References

Arif Rohman. (1999). Subordinasi Siswa dan Dominasi Guru, (Tinjauan Kritis mengenai Politik wacana Pendidikan). Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 1(5), 29-38. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/60598-ID-subordinasi-siswa-dan-dominasi-guru.pdf

Aswaruddin. (2021). Terpuruknya Pendidikan di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies, 2(1), 36–50. https://pusdikra-publishing.com/index.php/jrss/article/download/133/122

Biesta, G. (2010). The New Logic of Emancipation: The Methodology of Jacques Rancière, University of Illinois. University of Illinois: Journal Educational Theory, 60.

HW, T. W. G. (2011). Filsafat Pendidikan: Mazhab-Mazhab Filsafata Pendidikan. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2013). Dari Mao ke Marcue: Percikan Filsafat Marxis Pasca-Lenin. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Munirah. (2015). Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia: Antara Keinginan dan Realita. Jurnal Auladuna, 2(2), 233–245. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/auladuna/article/view/879

Nina Power. (2010). Interview with Jacques Ranciere. Emphemera Interview Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(1), 77–81. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/10-1rancierepower.pdf

Novia Aisyah. (2023). Data Kemendikbudristek: Indonesia Kekurangan 1.312.759 Guru Pada 2024". Detik.Com. https://www.detik.com/edu/sekolah/d-6739311/data-kemendikbudristek-indonesia-kekurangan-1-312-759-guru-pada-2024

Pepen Supendi. (2016). Variasi (Format) Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Almufida, 1(1), 159–181. https://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/almufida/article/download/110/105

Ross, K. (1991). Jacques Ransire, The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lesson in Intelectual Emansipation. Stanford University Press.

Said, M. (1989). Ilmu Pendidikan. Penerbit Alumni.

Siti alifah. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia Untuk Mengejar Ketertinggalan Dari Negara Lain. CERMIN?: JURNAL PENELITIAN, 5(1), 113–123. https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/cermin_unars/article/download/968/744/

Siti Fadia Nurul Fitri. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1617–1620. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/download/1148/1029

Suryad, A. A. (2008). Pendidikan Islam Mazhab Kritis Perbandingan Pendidikan Timur dan Barat. Gama Media.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-04

How to Cite

Dewa Gede Putra Atmajaya, Oktovianus Kosat, & Mario Venerial Umbu Zerri. (2024). Konsep Emansipasi Intelektual Menurut Jacques Ranciere dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(5), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2083