Membangun Perilaku Inovatif di Tempat Kerja: Dampak Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Work-Life Balance, dan Budaya Kerja dengan Employee Engagement sebagai Moderasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v6i5.5895Keywords:
Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Budaya Kerja, Work-Life Balance, Employee Engagement, Perilaku InovatifAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan transformasional, budaya kerja, dan work-life balance terhadap perilaku inovatif pekerja, dengan employee engagement sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Data diperoleh dari 108 pekerja Indonesia yang bekerja di perusahaan Jepang yang beroperasi di wilayah Jawa Barat. Mayoritas responden memiliki pengalaman kerja lebih dari lima tahun. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gaya kepemimpinan transformasional (? = 0,220; p = 0,001), budaya kerja (? = 0,332; p = 0,000), dan work-life balance (? = 0,365; p = 0,000) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku inovatif pekerja. Employee engagement juga menunjukkan pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap perilaku inovatif (? = 0,191; p = 0,016). Uji moderasi mengindikasikan bahwa employee engagement memperkuat hubungan antara gaya kepemimpinan transformasional, memperlemah pengaruh work-life balance terhadap perilaku inovatif (moderasi parsial), serta memoderasi secara negatif hubungan antara budaya kerja dan perilaku inovatif (moderasi kualitatif). Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya membangun lingkungan kerja yang mendukung inovasi melalui pendekatan kepemimpinan yang transformatif, budaya kerja yang kondusif, keseimbangan kehidupan kerja, dan keterlibatan emosional.
References
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2002). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094853
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands?Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Chang, S. C., & Lee, M. S. (2007). A study on relationship among leadership, organizational culture, the operation of learning organization and employees’ job satisfaction. The Learning Organization, 14(2), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710727014
Darvishmotevali, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Work–life balance and psychological well-being in the hospitality industry: A moderating role of locus of control. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102633De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00657.x
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Sune, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
Hartmann, E. A. (2006). The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms. Construction Innovation, 6(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170610713991
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Karatepe, O. M. (2013). High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: The mediation of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.05.003
Khalili, A. (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Management Decision, 54(9), 2277–2293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0534
Kuroda, Y., & Yamamoto, H. (2018). Japanese-style human resource management in Asia: Adaptation to local environments and implications for employee engagement. Asian Business & Management, 17(3), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0031-4
Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337
Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high?performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roza Amelia, Nikolas Fajar Wuryaningrat, Anita Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS).
