Designing a Strategic Pivot as a Dynamic Capability: An Integrated VFT–AHP Method in Legacy Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jimt.v7i6.9488Keywords:
strategic pivot, dynamic capabilities, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Value-Focused Thinking, organisational routinesAbstract
Legacy news organisations face the structural collapse of their advertising-funded model as audiences move to algorithm-driven platforms. This paper asks how such a firm should choose and design a strategic pivot under deep uncertainty and without reliable forecasts. Using a single-case study of an Indonesian online news company (anonymised as SOCA), it develops an integrated and auditable decision process: Value-Focused Thinking elicits the leadership's decision criteria, the Analytic Hierarchy Process ranks three candidate operating models for a pivot toward a creative hub, and the choice is implemented through an ambidextrous structure, a sequenced change roadmap, and a Balanced Scorecard. The whole process is read as a dynamic capability, the sensing, seizing and transforming routine the firm can re-run for future shifts. Across a three-member senior leadership panel the method selects a hybrid lean-core-plus-partners model (aggregated priority about 0.50), unanimously at the individual level and robustly under sensitivity analysis; an independent demand-side cross-check reaches the same result. The contribution is methodological and practical: it shows how a high-stakes structural choice can be made transparently from leadership values rather than from assumption, and, more importantly, how that choice can be embedded as a repeatable sensing, seizing and transforming routine the firm can re-run for the next disruption.
References
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2019). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization (13th ed.). Cengage.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv322v4g7
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2023–2025). Digital news report, Indonesia. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford University Press.
Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. (2020). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (22nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Danang Waluyajati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwaJurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan (JIMT) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan (JIMT).











































