Nodal governance Dalam Kerjasama Internasional Kepolisian Indonesia - Malaysia Dalam Menghadapi Transnational Organized Crime

Authors

  • Chaidir Zahari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hikmahanto Juwana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muradi Muradi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Riani Rachmawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8173

Keywords:

Nodal Governance, kerjasama kepolisian, kejahatan transnasional terorganisir, Indonesia-Malaysia, Keamanan Regional

Abstract

Kejahatan transnasional terorganisir (TOC) merupakan ancaman serius bagi keamanan regional Indonesia–Malaysia. Kerjasama kepolisian konvensional sering terkendala perbedaan hukum, birokrasi, dan politik. Tujuan: Artikel ini menganalisis penerapan model Nodal governance sebagai strategi penguatan kerjasama kepolisian bilateral dalam penanganan TOC. Metode: Penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus, wawancara mendalam dengan informan kunci (Polri, PDRM, Divhubinter), dan analisis dokumen resmi. Hasil: Nodal governance terbukti efektif dalam mengintegrasikan multi-aktor (kepolisian, imigrasi, bea cukai, masyarakat sipil) untuk koordinasi intelijen, ekstradisi, dan operasi

References

Ambarwati, R., & Rahman, A. (2022). Border security and narcotics trafficking: Indonesia-Malaysia cooperation challenges. Journal of Southeast Asian Security Studies, 15(3), 45-67.

Anderson, J. (2005). The shifting significance of borders. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Transnational democracy: Political spaces and border crossings (pp. 87-104). Routledge.

Andreas, P., & Nadelmann, E. (2006). Policing the globe: Criminalization and crime control in international relations. Oxford University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Burris, S., Drahos, P., & Shearing, C. (2005). Nodal governance. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 30, 30-58.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Djamin, A. (2019). ASEAN cooperation in combating transnational crime: The case of Indonesia-Malaysia police collaboration. Asian Journal of Criminology, 14(2), 123-145.

Dupont, B. (2004). Security in the age of networks. Policing and Society, 14(1), 76-91.

Emmers, R. (2018). ASEAN and the securitization of transnational crime in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 31(6), 723-740.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Sage.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Longman.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Shelley, L. I. (2018). Dark commerce: How a new illicit economy is threatening our future. Princeton University Press.

UNODC. (2021). World Drug Report 2021. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Zahari, C., Juwana, H., Muradi, M., & Rachmawati, R. (2026). Nodal governance Dalam Kerjasama Internasional Kepolisian Indonesia - Malaysia Dalam Menghadapi Transnational Organized Crime. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(4), 2746–2755. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8173