Intervensi Prinsip Responsibility To Protect Terhadap Masyarakat Sipil dalam Situasi Perang Israel – Palestina Tahun 2023

Authors

  • Renzi Zian Azmi Falevi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mirsa Astuti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2371

Keywords:

Responsibility To Protect Principle, War, International Law

Abstract

One of the longest and most complex conflicts in the world is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The security situation in the region remains extremely fragile despite peace efforts. In 2023, another escalation of violence occurred, killing civilians. The principle of the responsibility to protect (R2P) is important to discuss in this situation. This study uses normative legal scholarship-also known as positive legal scholarship, doctrinal, or purely as a methodology-to conduct this research. The main focus of the research is written law and legal traditions held by the community. Primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials are included in the secondary data sources, which are an essential component of this methodology.In 2005, the United Nations (UN) established the global Responsibility to Protect (R2P) standard. This concept says that states have the primary responsibility to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity and other human rights violations. This concept is based on existing international rules, such as Articles 1 and 2 of the UN Charter. Violations of R2P principles in the 2023 Israeli-Palestinian conflict have significant legal, security and moral consequences. Such violations are considered war crimes and crimes against humanity for which international tribunals are legally accountable. Security-wise, a prolonged conflict could lead to significant regional instability and refugees. Morally, these violations constitute a human tragedy.

References

Astuti, M. (2018). Efektivitas Hukum Humaniter Internasional Dalam Melindungi Cagar Budaya Di Negara Konflik. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v3i1.3143

Dewantara, J. A., Sulistyarini, Afandi, Warneri, & Efiani. (2023). Pelanggaran HAM Dalam Konflik Israel dan Palestina Berdampak Terhadap Hilangnya Hak Asasi Manusia Khususnya Hak Anak di Palestina. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 19–25.

Hukum, F., & Diponegoro, U. (n.d.). Hhi 1. 128–136.

Husni, L. P. (2022). Responsibility to Protect sebagai Doktrin atau Norma yang Berkembang dalam Hukum Internasional. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), 151–171.

Kunci, K. (2024). TRAUMA HEALING?: ANAK-ANAK KORBAN KONFLIK PALESTINA- Pendahuluan Tahun ke tahun hingga sampai detik ini , konflik kemanusiaan antara. 4(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.35719/sociocouns.vxix.xx

Kusuma, S., & Harisman, H. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Peserta Misi Khusus PBB Terkait dengan Kematian dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas ( Studi Kasus Pasukan Garuda Lebanon 2022 ). 6(3), 8602–8610.

Pambudi, K. S. (2021). Menimbang Salad Bowl dalam Skema One State Solution sebagai Solusi Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Israel-Palestina. Sosio E-Kons, 13(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v13i1.6569

Pieriza, D., & Rahayu Lestari, S. (2022). Legitimasi Penerapan Prinsip Responsibility To Protect dalam Penggunaan Senjata Kimia di Republik Arab Suriah. Jurnal Hukum Internasional Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1(2), 81. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/belli/article/view/27410/18970

Pusriansyah, F., Perdana, F. W., Wibisono, Y., Irwan, I., & Kelana, S. (2022). Kajian Implementasi Prinsip ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R To P) dalam Praktik Internasional Kasus Genosida di Rwanda. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 3(02), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.36418/jist.v3i2.372

Putri, D. A., & Sidik, H. (2020). Responsibility to Protect dalam Kasus Genosida oleh ISIL terhadap Yazidi-Irak melalui Intervensi Militer Amerika Serikat. Jurnal ICMES, 4(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.35748/jurnalicmes.v4i1.65

Santi, T. K. (2020). Peran TNI dalam Pembinaan Teritorial (Studi Kasus di Desa Sungai Ceper, Kecamatan Sungai Menang, Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir, Sumatera Selatan). Ampera: A Research Journal on Politics and Islamic Civilization, 1(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.19109/ampera.v1i2.5554

Susilowati, I., Fauzi, M., Virqiyan, S., & Zahidin, A. El. (2022). Eksistensi Realisme dalam Aneksasi Israel Terhadap Palestina. JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH, 4(5), 1155–1172. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i5.28514

Teo, H. M. (2019). The continuum of sexual violence in occupied germany, 1945-49. Women’s History Review, 5(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029600200111

Wardoyo, B., & Valentino, R. (2022). Breaking taboo: Explaining the United Arab Emirates’ Decision to Establish Diplomatic Relationship with Israel “Breaking taboo”: Keputusan Uni Emirat Arab untuk Melakukan Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik dengan Israel. Global Strategis, 16(1), 147–174. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361684390_Breaking_Taboo_Explaining_the_United_Arab_Emirates’_Decision_to_Establish_Diplomatic_Relationship_with_Israel

Widagdo, S., & Kurniaty, R. (2021). Prinsip Responsibility To Protect (R2P) Dalam Konflik Israel- Palestina: Bagaimana Sikap Indonesia? Arena Hukum, 14(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6

Yuniarti, Y., Retnowatik, F. W., & Pasan, E. (2021). Pelaksanaan Prinsip Responsibility To Protect PBB Dalam Penanganan Krisis Kemanusiaan Di Afrika (Republik Afrika Tengah, Sudan & Nigeria). Jurnal Sosial-Politika, 2(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.54144/jsp.v2i1.28

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Zian Azmi Falevi, R., & Astuti, M. (2024). Intervensi Prinsip Responsibility To Protect Terhadap Masyarakat Sipil dalam Situasi Perang Israel – Palestina Tahun 2023. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(5), 1838–1849. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2371