Penjatuhan Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Hak Desain Industri Mengacu pada Putusan Kasasi MA No 1609 K/Pid.Sus/2020

Authors

  • Citra Annisya Juwansari Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Mery Ajeng Wijayanti Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Karyn Firda Faridyan Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Siti Nur Halimah Monica Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2196

Keywords:

Industry Desaign, Industrial Design Rights Violation, criminal act

Abstract

Industrial design is a creation about the shape, configuration, or composition of lines or colors, or lines and colors or a combination thereof in three-dimensional or two-dimensional forms that give an aesthetic impression. Diansari Puri Plastindo who has a Bath Tub Industrial Design certificate registered with the Directorate of Copyright and Industrial Design at the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights with Registration Number IDD00000035015. There is a problem formulation, namely Does the Judge's Consideration state that the article indicted by the Public Prosecutor based on Article 54 paragraph juncto Article 9 paragraph Law Number 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code is in accordance with the defendant's actions?, and What are the Judges' Considerations in imposing the Criminal Law in Decision Number 1609 K/Pid. Sus/2020 is in accordance with the Criminal System in Indonesia? Conclusions: First, the judge's consideration stated that the article indicted by the public prosecutor based on Article 54 paragraph Juncto Article 9 paragraph Law Number 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code is in accordance with the actions of the defendant. The two judges' considerations in imposing a sentence in Decision.

References

Amirudin, & Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arto, M. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Basalama, & Aqdi, M. (2011). PELANGGARAN HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI DAN FAKTOR PENYEBABNYA (Studi Kasus Kantor HAKI di Pengadilan Negeri Klaten). Skripsi.

Diantha, I. M. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Guza, F. A. (2011). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Asa Mandiri.

Lattan, A. J. (2014). Pertimbangan-pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Pidana. Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 55.

Lubis, M. F., & Masnun. (2020). Perlindungan Desain Industri dalam Upaya Memajukan Produk Lokal dalam Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. MUKAMIDAH Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 134.

Muhammad, A. (2001). Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Prasetyo, T. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrina. Makasar: Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Riswandi, B. A. (2004). Politik Hukum Hak Cipta: Meletakkan Kepentingan Nasional Untuk Tujuan Global. Jurnal Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 13.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normati. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sofyan, A., & Asis, A. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana suatu pengantar. Jakarta: PRENADAMEDIA GROUP.

Sudarmanto. (2012). KI & HKI Serta Implementasinya Bagi Indonesia. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Utomo, T. S. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Era Global. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Waluyo, B. (2022). Hukum Pidana. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/11016/3/bab%2011.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-05

How to Cite

Annisya Juwansari, C., Ajeng Wijayanti, M., Karyn Firda Faridyan, & Siti Nur Halimah Monica. (2024). Penjatuhan Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Hak Desain Industri Mengacu pada Putusan Kasasi MA No 1609 K/Pid.Sus/2020. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(5), 1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2196