Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Basic Technical Course dengan Pendekatan Model Kirkpatrick di PT United Tractors Pandu Engineering

Authors

  • Dicky Dwi Saputra UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nanang Alamsyah UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Yulizar Widiatama UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v7i3.8266

Keywords:

Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick, Efektivitas Pelatihan, Basic Technical Course, Transfer Pembelajaran, Asesmen Kompetensi

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas program pelatihan Basic Technical Course untuk Material Engineer di PT United Tractors Pandu Engineering menggunakan model evaluasi Kirkpatrick pada tiga level: Reaksi (Level 1), Pembelajaran (Level 2), dan Perilaku (Level 3). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif-inferensial dengan sampel jenuh 17 peserta pelatihan offline. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner skala Likert untuk Level 1 dan Level 3, serta nilai ujian akhir untuk Level 2. Hasil menunjukkan Level 1 mencapai grand mean 4,699 (Sangat Puas); Level 2 membuktikan rata-rata skor peserta sebesar 81,222 melebihi standar Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal 75 secara signifikan (t = 6,000; p < 0,001; Cohen’s d = 1,455); Level 3 menghasilkan mean keseluruhan 2,758 (Baik), dengan dimensi Penerapan Keterampilan sebagai satu-satunya dimensi berkategori Kurang Baik (mean = 2,447), mengindikasikan adanya kesenjangan transfer pelatihan. Program pelatihan terbukti efektif pada level reaksi dan pembelajaran, namun memerlukan mekanisme intervensi pascapelatihan yang terstruktur guna meningkatkan transfer keterampilan ke tempat kerja. Evaluasi ini hanya mencakup Level 1–3; Level 4 (Hasil/Results) tidak dianalisis karena keterbatasan akses data kinerja organisasional dan rentang waktu observasi.

References

Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x

Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880

Cohen, J. (with Internet Archive). (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates. http://archive.org/details/statisticalpower0000cohe_j0l3

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Deckop, J. R., Konrad, A. M., Perlmutter, F. D., & Freely, J. L. (2006). The effect of human resource management practices on the job retention of former welfare clients. Human Resource Management, 45(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20131

Ford, J. K., Quiñones, M. A., Sego, D. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1992). FACTORS AFFECTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO PERFORM TRAINED TASKS ON THE JOB. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00858.x

Gegenfurtner, A. (2011). Motivation and transfer in professional training: A meta-analysis of the moderating effects of knowledge type, instruction, and assessment conditions. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.04.001

George, D., & Mallery, P. (with Internet Archive). (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Boston : Allyn and Bacon. http://archive.org/details/spssforwindowsst00geor

Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x

Holton, E. F. (2005). Holton’s Evaluation Model: New Evidence and Construct Elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422304272080

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (with Internet Archive). (2006). Evaluating training programs [electronic resource]: The four levels. San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Koehler. http://archive.org/details/Evaluating_Training_Programs_9781576757963

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2018). Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.

Phillips, J. J. (with Internet Archive). (2002). How to measure training results: A practical guide to tracking the six key indicators. New York : McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/howtomeasuretrai0000phil

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (t.t.). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF, DAN R&D. Diambil 3 Mei 2026, dari http://archive.org/details/buku-metode-penelitian-sugiyono

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB‐BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: A META‐ANALYSIS. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 623–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x

Tamkin, P. (with Internet Archive). (2002). Kirkpatrick and beyond: A review of training evaluation. Brighton : Institute for Employment Studies. http://archive.org/details/kirkpatrickbeyon0000tamk

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Downloads

Published

2026-05-10

How to Cite

Saputra, D. D., Alamsyah, N., & Widiatama, Y. (2026). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Basic Technical Course dengan Pendekatan Model Kirkpatrick di PT United Tractors Pandu Engineering. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 7(3), 2492–2503. https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v7i3.8266

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (April - Mei 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dicky Dwi Saputra, Nanang Alamsyah, Yulizar Widiatama

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS).