Konsepsi dan Implementasi Penilaian Literasi Membaca Berbasis HOTS dalam Bahasa Inggris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v5i2.1867Keywords:
Teacher's Conception, Reading Literasi, English Language, Assessment, Higher-Order Thinking SkillsAbstract
Reading literacy plays an important role in determining one's success in pursuing education, entering the workforce, and navigating daily life. In facing the challenges of the 21st century with increasing globalization and the abundance of information in various forms, the education system needs to prepare students with high-level thinking skills in reading literacy so that they learn to manage and interpret various information critically. This research aims to explore English teachers' conceptions of assessing high-order thinking skills (HOTS) in reading literacy and its implementation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 English teachers in Jakarta. The results of the study indicate that teachers define HOTS assessment in reading literacy as higher-order thinking abilities compared to mere recall, referring to the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Most teachers in this study also understand HOTS assessment as evaluating students' abilities to transfer knowledge, think critically, think creatively, solve problems, and engage in metacognition. According to the teachers, HOTS-based reading literacy assessment aims to enable students to think critically, solve problems, and think creatively and innovatively. HOTS questions are formulated by providing texts to students and asking questions that require students to identify implied meanings in the text, draw conclusions based on the provided text, or analyze using various sources. The main challenges faced by teachers in implementing HOTS-based literacy assessment are students' limited vocabulary, students’lack of interest in reading, students’ lack of creative thinking, limited students' abilities, and insufficient time available for learning English.
References
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). Conceptualizing and assessing higher-order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367
Anderson, L. W. (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s. Pearson Education Limited.
ANTARA News. (2018). Mendikbud: Soal “HOTS” untuk UN SMP disesuaikan. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/703752/mendikbud-soal-hots-untuk-un-smp-disesuaikan
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319737
Bungsu, A. P., & Dafit, F. (2021). Pelaksanaan literasi membaca di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 522–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i3.40796
Deneen, C. C., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). The impact of conceptions of assessment on assessment literacy in a teacher education program. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1225380
Driana, E., & Ernawati. (2019). Teachers’ understanding and practices in assessing higher order thinking skills at primary schools. Acitya: Journal of Teaching & Education, 1(2), 110–118.
Driana, E., Susilowati, A., Ernawati, & Ghani, A. R. A. (2021). Assesing student’s higher-order thinking skills: Knowledge and practices of chemistry teachers in vocational senior secondary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 27(1), 37–47.
Juliana, R., Witarsa, R., & Masrul, M. (2023). Penerapan Gerakan Literasi terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Literasi Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Education Research, 4(3), 951–956. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i3.265
Junita, T. T., Wulandari, B. A., & Ali, M. (2022). Analisis penerapan literasi membaca dan menulis di SD Pertiwi I Kota Jambi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 763–776. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v3i2.1138
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/19690/1/file_akm2.pdf
Lee, C. D., & Goldman, S. R. (2015). Assessing Literary Reasoning: Text and Task Complexities. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044369
Magnusson, C. G. (2022). Reading Literacy Practices in Norwegian Lower_Secondary Classrooms: Examining the Patterns of Teacher Questions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869078
Martínez, R. S., Harris, B., & McClain, M. B. (2014). Practices That Promote English Reading for English Learners (ELs). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 24(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.903192
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Nurmawati, N., Driana, E., & Ernawati, E. (2020). Pemahaman guru kimia SMA tentang penilaian kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan implementasinya. EDUSAINS, 12(2). http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/13613
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pishghadam, R., Adamson, B., Sadafian, S. S., & Kan, F. L. F. (2014). Conceptions of assessment and teacher burnout. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.817382
Preus, B. (2012). A uthentic I nstruction for 21 st C entury L earning?: H igher O rder T hinking in an I nclusive S chool. American Secondary Education, 40(3), 59–80.
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230.
Roy, D. (2012). Website analysis as a tool for task-based language learning and higher order thinking in an EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.751549
Schulz, H., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–86.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ernawati Ernawati, Elin Driana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS).
