Stimulus-Organism-Response Dynamics in Short-Form Video Commerce: Perceived Authenticity, Hedonic Motivation, and Impulse Buying Among TikTok Shop Users

Authors

  • Diana Agustina Universitas Widyatama, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ayuningtyas Yuli Hapsari Universitas Widyatama, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jemsi.v7i6.8660

Keywords:

Perceived Authenticity, Hedonic Shopping Motivation, Impulse Buying, Social Commerce, Phenomenology, TikTok Shop

Abstract

Indonesia is among the fastest-growing social commerce markets globally, with TikTok Shop serving as the dominant platform for impulsive skincare purchasing. Despite growing scholarly interest in social commerce, qualitative understanding of how consumers subjectively experience and interpret authenticity cues and hedonic motivations during impulsive buying remains limited. This study employs a qualitative phenomenological approach to investigate the lived experiences of 20 purposively selected Indonesian TikTok Shop users. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, structured observations, and documentation over an eight-month fieldwork period, then analyzed using Miles and Huberman's interactive model alongside phenomenological thematic analysis. Findings reveal that participants perceived authenticity across source, message, and relationship dimensions as a trust-generating mechanism that lowers psychological barriers to spontaneous purchasing. Hedonic motivations adventure, social, gratification, and role-playing were experienced as emotionally activating forces driving impulsive decisions. Critically, participants described an experiential interplay in which authenticity amplifies hedonic responses and hedonic platform states heighten receptivity to authenticity cues. These findings enrich understanding of the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework in social commerce by illuminating the experiential mechanisms underlying consumer impulse behavior in short-form video environments.

References

Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00007-1

Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers face identity disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 109, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.046

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

Beverland, M. B., & Luxton, S. (2005). Managing integrated marketing communication (IMC) through strategic decoupling. Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639210

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, Z., Gao, Y., Shi, X., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Live stream shopping and impulse buying: The role of parasocial relationships. Journal of Business Research, 148, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.008

Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Influence, new and expanded: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Business.

De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035

Demiryürek, B., & Çakıcı, C. (2023). The effect of live streaming e-commerce on impulse buying behavior: The roles of parasocial interaction and attachment. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113828

Garg, R., Sharma, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2021). Beauty and cosmetics industry: Current trends and future opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 129, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.035

Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas I: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Hackett Publishing Company.

Ivanenko, N., Krasotkina, O., & Mottaeva, A. (2023). Digital transformation of consumer behavior in e-commerce and social commerce. E-Commerce Research and Applications, 59, 101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101292

Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., Weun, S., & Beatty, S. E. (2002). The product-specific nature of impulse buying tendency. Journal of Business Research, 54(3), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00109-6

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225

Kim, M., Beynon, M., & Yoon, S. J. (2020). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations in social commerce: A meta-analytic examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(2), 314–336.

Li, Y., Xie, Y., Tao, W., & Ursiny, W. (2021). Short video marketing on TikTok: Factors influencing product sales and consumer purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 741585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741585

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Liu, Y., Tan, W., & Wu, S. (2023). Does higher perceived authenticity enhance parasocial relationships in live streaming? A moderated mediation model. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101911

Matz, S. C., Scholer, H., & Berman, J. Z. (2020). Personalization in digital marketing and e-commerce at scale: A meta-review. Journal of Retailing, 96(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.02.007

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Momentum Works. (2024). Southeast Asia social commerce report. Retrieved from https://momentumworks.com

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Nielsen. (2023). Global consumer insights survey: Indonesia edition. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2

Rook, D. W. (1987). The buying impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209105

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Vos, A. L. (2020). Consumer responses to chatbot conversational agent services: The role of perceived authenticity. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 31(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsim-01-2020-0002

Setiawan, A. B., Mulyanto, A., Wijayanto, H., & Ardha, M. M. (2023). The impact of influencer's authenticity and credibility on purchase intention: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 30(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabes-08-2022-5168

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.

Statista. (2024). TikTok Shop Southeast Asia market data. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Su, L., Swanson, S. R., Chen, X., & Liang, L. (2024). How does emotional support from peers influence impulsive purchase in online communities? Journal of Business Research, 169, 113826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.113826

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole.

Verhagen, T., & van Deursen, A. J. (2011). Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. International Journal of Human-ComputerStudies, 69(9), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.004

Verplanken, B., & Herabadi, A. (2001). Individual differences in impulse buying tendency: Feeling and no thinking. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S71–S83. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.423

Wu, Z., Xu, X., & Zhang, H. (2023). Live streaming commerce and consumer impulsive buying behavior: The role of social presence and parasocial relationship. Electronic CommerceResearch and Applications, 58, 101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101248

Downloads

Published

2026-07-09

How to Cite

Diana Agustina, & Ayuningtyas Yuli Hapsari. (2026). Stimulus-Organism-Response Dynamics in Short-Form Video Commerce: Perceived Authenticity, Hedonic Motivation, and Impulse Buying Among TikTok Shop Users . Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 7(6), 4880–4892. https://doi.org/10.38035/jemsi.v7i6.8660